Product Design
A route to someone real.
We reimagined Contact Us as a clearer path to the right inbox, useful destination, or real person.
Six weeks to imagine a better front door.
I chose the IBM.com Contact Us experience from the incubator assignments and joined four other designers to propose what its future state could be.
My official role was Visual Designer, but the work crossed disciplines. I conducted several early sponsor-user interviews, helped guide team decisions, and took a larger hand in the mid- and high-fidelity artifacts as the concept became tangible.
Five-person team · 2021 · six-week concept. This was collaborative work. I helped connect research, interaction decisions, visual direction, prototype, and final story.
Useful if you already knew IBM.
The old experience offered little guidance to people who were new to IBM or unsure where to take a question.
If you were a primary customer with a representative, you had a shortcut. For someone without an established IBM relationship, the page could become a dead end. The team also saw the receiving-side burden: many categories, poorly differentiated support destinations, and requests that still needed to be sorted by people.
We combined sponsor-user interviews, competitor analysis, and search data. Two problems stood out.
Support overload
Support destinations were difficult to distinguish, so inquiries could reach the wrong team.
Inconsistent entry points
Help options varied across product pages.
Make the next destination visible.
We shifted the emphasis from a general form to clear choices about where to go next.
The concept brings support, sales, learning, and other routes forward, with contact options for people who still need help.
The goal was to get people closer to the right information or person.
How the routing model took shape.
These explorations show how the team moved from a directory to grouped choices, direct contact routes, and an option to reach a person.



Team explorations from our February 23, 2021 presentation; individual screen authorship is not attributed.
Making the front door feel more human.
I remember wanting the page to feel warmer and more helpful. The copy and imagery reflect that intent, with choices people could understand without knowing IBM's internal structure.


Both headlines address the visitor directly and offer help.
The concept groups support, sales, careers, learning, partners, and general inquiries into recognizable choices.
Contact information and assisted routes remain available when self-service is not enough.



Carry the work beyond the room.
Our final presentation connected the research to the routing and interface decisions.

I am still especially proud of the final playback and the way our team made the concept understandable beyond the sprint.
Program feedback recognized my presentation storytelling, the way I helped co-lead the team, and how I connected user needs to research evidence.
Paraphrased from private program feedback.
What carried forward.
We shared the future state with the team responsible for the real Contact Us experience. I later recognized parts of its direction in the page.
The useful idea was simple: make the next destination clear and keep a person within reach.
Influence and concept boundaryThis is a bounded first-person recollection. Similarity in later versions does not prove exact lineage, sole authorship, or direct implementation.